The big "imageshack" topic...

[Superully]

Edit by Nuno :
following this topic

Does anybody have a slideshow on Flickr or so? I have lots of problems viewing the pics on the previous page hosted on Imageshack.

that's because imageshack sucks so much!!! i don't understand why people keep on using that crap ... so damn slow, shitty ads!

[2-mad]

Does anybody have a slideshow on Flickr or so? I have lots of problems viewing the pics on the previous page hosted on Imageshack.

that's because imageshack sucks so much!!! i don't understand why people keep on using that crap ... so damn slow, shitty ads!

Because some people use a good internet connection and don't feel that there is something slow or whatever ..
Some things are not so super as they supposed to be ..

[Superully]

i would say that i have a damn good internet connection and it still takes forever to load those imageshack pictures - especially when you have to click on every sinlge one of them. why not switch to something else like flickr and "embed" the pics in the post?

[Luigi]

i would say that i have a damn good internet connection and it still takes forever to load those imageshack pictures - especially when you have to click on every sinlge one of them.

Same here....Imageshack SUCKS!

32.000 connection!!

[2-mad]

I can't see any delay at imageshack .. from here the pics open like the local disk ..
Maybe the reason is my Mac or the 50k downstream .. I don't know ..

I deleted the pics so that you guys will have no delay .

Thanks

Dietmar

[Luigi]

Dietmar, krieg das bitte nicht in den falschen Hals. Die Thumbnails werden nicht verzögert angezeigt, aber wenn man auf die Bilder klickt, geht das bei 99% aller Bilder gääähnend langsam. Ich hab mich damit noch nicht beschäftigt, weil ich die entweder im Forum anhänge oder auf meinen Webspace in die Galerie lade, aber ich glaube, es gibt bessere Bilderhoster.

Also, nicht böse gemeint 

[Superully]

war von mir natürlich auch nicht böse gemeint, aber das was luigi gesagt hat stimmt zu 100% - egal ob die imageshack-bilder von dir kommen oder von anderen usern. das teil ist einfach uuuuuuuunheimlich langsam und hat zudem noch nervende werbung! warum die bilder nicht direkt hier einbinden?

[Etienne MacGyver]

Dietmar, krieg das bitte nicht in den falschen Hals. Die Thumbnails werden nicht verzögert angezeigt, aber wenn man auf die Bilder klickt, geht das bei 99% aller Bilder gääähnend langsam. Ich hab mich damit noch nicht beschäftigt, weil ich die entweder im Forum anhänge oder auf meinen Webspace in die Galerie lade, aber ich glaube, es gibt bessere Bilderhoster.

Also, nicht böse gemeint  

google translate :
Dietmar, please do not use the war the wrong way. The thumbnails are not displayed delayed, but if you click on the images, which is at 99% of all images gääähnend slowly. I am so not busy, because I either the forum attached to my webspace or upload to the gallery, but I think there are better pictures Hoster.

 So, do not mean any harm

war von mir natürlich auch nicht böse gemeint, aber das was luigi gesagt hat stimmt zu 100% - egal ob die imageshack-bilder von dir kommen oder von anderen usern. das teil ist einfach uuuuuuuunheimlich langsam und hat zudem noch nervende werbung! warum die bilder nicht direkt hier einbinden?

google translate :
I was of course not mean any harm, but that which was spoken by luigi agrees 100% - no matter whether the image hack pictures come from you or from other users. the part is simply uuuuuuuunheimlich slowly and in addition has the annoying advertising! why not embed the images directly here?

[2-mad]

Kann diese sinnlose Diskussion mal jemand schliessen ??

Please close this useless thread .
Thanks

[DarthNuno]

Yeps, I can host the pictures for you on my server, no problem guys 
Just zip your pictures and send me the files over www.rapidshare.de for instance.
Don't exceed the 900 pixels for your pictures 

[Superully]

Kann diese sinnlose Diskussion mal jemand schliessen ??
Please close this useless thread .

honestly, i can't see why you think this discussion is useless. obviously there are people out there who are having problems with imageshack. these problems have been reported to you so that you might change it in the future. instead, you're saying the thread is useless and delete your pictures ...

[2-mad]

honestly, i can't see why you think this discussion is useless. obviously there are people out there who are having problems with imageshack. these problems have been reported to you so that you might change it in the future. instead, you're saying the thread is useless and delete your pictures ...

This discussion IS useless.
You have problems with imageshack ? for you it's to lame and too much adverts ?
So I deleted the pics, because I don't wanna see that here every second message is : IS sucks, IS is laggy IS is this or that.
I porefered it, because its easy to use, I use upload and managing Tools on my Mac that make i really easy for me.
I'm not a Computerspecialist like you .. so I use what works fine for ME ..
And that's exactly what I mean .. we do discuss about things, I don't like to discuss about .
Feel free to use a Imageservice what ever you like and/or prefer .
Thats what I mean with "useless thread" .. what are we talking about ?
We will never get a result here in this thread , so it's useless ..

regards

Dietmar

[Luigi]

I'm sorry that I have written in German but my englisch is not good enough to find the correct words for what I wanted to say.

I just wanted to say that we didn't want to attack 2-mad personally.

But someone better delete the whole thread or this will never end.

[Superully]

This discussion IS useless.
We will never get a result here in this thread , so it's useless ..

whatever ...

[2-mad]

But someone better delete the whole thread or this will never end.

That's what I say ! .. Thanks !